Digital Economy as a Moderator: Examining the Impact of Economic Development on Carbon Emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/35hmex56Keywords:
GDP Per Capita; Carbon Emission; U-Shaped Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC); Digital Economy; Consumption Upgrade; Urbanization Proces.Abstract
Under the Paris Climate Accord, China has pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 2030 to help limit global temperature rise within 2°C. Using panel data for 2011–2019 and system GMM estimation, this study examines the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) in the Chinese context and identifies both the direct and moderating effects of the digital economy. The results show that (i) the digital economy exerts a direct mitigating effect on carbon emissions, yet its interaction with GDP per capita is positive, indicating that in more digitalized regions the marginal impact of economic growth on emissions is stronger; and (ii) the relationship between GDP per capita and carbon emissions is U-shaped, with most regions situated on the rising limb, which explains the overall increase in emissions associated with GDP growth during the sample period. These findings suggest that the inverted-U EKC is not universally applicable, and that consumption upgrading and urbanization are key mechanisms driving emission dynamics. Therefore, achieving the Sustainable Development Goals requires policies tailored to development stages and regional heterogeneity. Aligning digital transformation with green growth is essential to balance economic advancement, evolving consumption, and environmental sustainability on China’s path to low-carbon development.
Downloads
References
[1] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/multiple-regression/book3045
[2] Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
[3] Bahri, E. N. A., Nor, A. H. S. M., Nor, N. H. H. M., & Sarmidi, T. (2017). Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth: A panel data analysis. Jurnal Pengurusan, 51(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2018-51-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2017-51-02
[4] Cao, L., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., & Yin, X. (2024). The impact of digital economy on low-carbon transition: What is the role of human capital? Finance Research Letters, 69, 106246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106246
[5] Chen, J., Li, W., Liu, Y., & Wu, B. (2024). Digital economy, transformation of factor effects, and urban carbon emissions: A test based on regulatory and threshold effects. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 23(2), 137–151.
[6] Dong, F., Hu, M., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, J., & Pan, Y. (2022). How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 852, 158401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401
[7] Fan, Y., & Wang, W. (2011). An empirical study on the driving effect of China's economic growth on carbon emission. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, (03), 7–13.
[8] Fang, C., Liu, H., & Wang, S. (2021). The coupling curve between urbanization and the eco-environment: China's urban agglomeration as a case study. Ecological Indicators, 130, 108107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108107
[9] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 3914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
[10] Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
[11] Huang, Z., Fan, H., & Shen, L. (2019). Case-based reasoning for selection of the best practices in low-carbon city development. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6(3), 416–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0036-1
[12] Jobert, T., Karanfil, F., & Tykhonenko, A. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve for carbon dioxide emissions: Lack of robustness to heterogeneity? Working Paper.
[13] Jobert, T., & Lanoie, P. (2012). Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve really exist? Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 14(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-012-0035-6
[14] Kirikkaleli, D., & Kalmaz, D. B. (2020). Testing the moderating role of urbanization on the environmental Kuznets curve: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(30), 38169–38180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09831-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09870-2
[15] Kon, Y. Q., Chin, M. Y., & Ong, S. L. (2023). The threshold level of economic growth in BRI and non-BRI developing countries for better environmental quality. Institutions and Economies, 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/IJIE.vol15no1.1
[16] Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from city-level empirical data in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131570
[17] Li, Z. (2023, August). The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Carbon Emissions: A Multi-dimensional Study Based on Threshold Effect. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Academic Conference on Blockchain, Information Technology and Smart Finance (ICBIS 2023) (pp. 1229–1243). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icbis-23/125989746atlantis-press.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-198-2_127
[18] Liu, X., & Saraiva, P. (2019). GMM estimation of spatial autoregressive models in a system of simultaneous equations with heteroskedasticity. Econometric Reviews, 38(4), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2017.1308087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2017.1308087
[19] Lyeonov, S., Pimonenko, T., Bilan, Y., Štreimikienė, D., & Mentel, G. (2019). Assessment of green investments’ impact on sustainable development: Linking gross domestic product per capita, greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy. Energies, 12(20), 3891. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203891
[20] Patiño, L. I., Padilla, E., Alcántara, V., & Raymond, J. L. (2020). The relationship of energy and CO₂ emissions with GDP per capita in Colombia. Atmosphere, 11(8), 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11080778
[21] Tang, Y., Zhu, H., & Yang, J. (2022). The asymmetric effects of economic growth, urbanization and deindustrialization on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Energy Reports, 8, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.076
[22] Wang, H., Lu, X., Deng, Y., Sun, Y., Nielsen, C. P., Liu, Y., ... & McElroy, M. B. (2019). China's CO₂ peak before 2030 implied from characteristics and growth of cities. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0339-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0339-6
[23] Wang, Q., & Li, L. (2021). The effects of population aging, life expectancy, unemployment rate, population density, per capita GDP, urbanization on per capita carbon emissions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.029
[24] Wang, Q., Sun, J., Pata, U. K., Li, R., & Kartal, M. T. (2024). Digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions: Examining the role of threshold variables. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(3), 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101644
[25] World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
[26] Xiang, X., Yang, G., & Sun, H. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on low-carbon, inclusive growth: Promoting or restraining. Sustainability, 14(12), 7187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127187
[27] Yi, M., Liu, Y., Sheng, M. S., & Wen, L. (2022). Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: New evidence1 from China. Energy Policy, 171, 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113271
[28] Yu, Z., Liu, S., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Has the digital economy reduced carbon emissions? Analysis based on panel data of 278 cities in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811814
[29] Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2013). Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy, 57, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.017
[30] Zhong, K., Fu, H., & Li, T. (2022). Can the digital economy facilitate carbon emissions decoupling? An empirical study based on provincial data in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116800
[31] Zhu, Z., Liu, B., Yu, Z., & Cao, J. (2022). Effects of the digital economy on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159450
[32] Roberts, J. T., & Grimes, P. E. (1997). Carbon intensity and economic development 1962–1991: A brief exploration of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 25(2), 191–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00104-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Sustainable Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






