Research on Aquatic Animal Behavior and Environmentally Friendly Fishing Techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/h2w41059Keywords:
Fish Behavior; Fishing Methods; Bycatch; Sustainable Development.Abstract
The research on “Aquatic Animal Behavior and Environmentally Friendly Fishing Techniques” aims to achieve sustainable fisheries development by understanding the behavioral patterns of aquatic animals during fishing operations and designing fishing gear and methods with high selectivity and minimal environmental impact. This research, grounded in fish behavioral responses to external stimuli like sound, light, and electricity, has been pursued internationally for decades. Advances in observation technology have led to the development of various devices (e.g., TEDs, BRDs) that reduce bycatch and protect juvenile fish. Current research has identified key factors affecting post-capture fish survival rates (e.g., entrapment duration, hook type) and explored leveraging behavioral differences (e.g., using ultrasound to deter dolphins) to enhance selectivity. However, existing studies are largely confined to single-stimulus experiments, with limited understanding of deeper mechanisms such as multi-factor interactions in complex marine environments, fish schooling communication, and behavioral perception. Future research must transition from single-factor analysis to comprehensive multi-factor studies, delving deeper into fish behavioral mechanisms. On one hand, this foundation should drive the development of novel eco-friendly fishing gear and establish a theoretical framework for resource conservation. On the other hand, economically viable and easily scalable fishing solutions must be proposed. Through pilot demonstrations, these efforts should tangibly enhance the ecological efficiency and sustainable development of China's coastal and offshore fishing industries.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Lumin, Chen Shuai. “Fish Behavioral Responses to External Stimuli and Fishing Methods.” In 10,000 Scientific Challenges: Agricultural Science Volume. Science Press, 2011. pp. 812-814.
[2] Vander Haegen GE , Ashbrook CE , Yi KW and DixonJF . 2004 . Survival of spring chinook salmon capturedand released in a selective commercial fi sheryusing gill nets and tangle nets . Fish. Res. 68 :123 – 133 .
[3] Lockwood SJ , Pawson MG and Eaton DR . 1983 . Theeffect of crowding on mackerel ( Scomber scombrusL.) - physical condition and mortality . Fish. Res. 2 :129 – 147 .
[4] Bartholomew A and Bohnsack JA . 2005 . A review ofcatch - and - release angling mortality with implicationsfor no - take reserves . Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 15 :129 – 154 .
[5] Kastelein RA;van der Heul S;van der Veen J;Verboom WC;Jennings N;de Haan D;Reijnders PJ.Effects of acoustic alarms, designed to reduce small cetacean bycatch in gillnet fisheries, on the behaviour of North Sea fish species in a large tank. Marine Environmental Research.2007(64)160-180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Sustainable Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






