Discussion on Economic Benefit Analysis and Sustainable Development Path in Low-Carbon City Development

Authors

  • Haoyu Liao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/2m4qhe95

Keywords:

Low-carbon City; Economic Benefits; Sustainable Development; Carbon Pricing; Green Employment; Urban Decarbonisation; Green Finance.

Abstract

The construction of low-carbon cities has emerged as an important strategy to realise the harmonious development of urban economy and climate change mitigation. Cities account for about 70% of global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. The economics of urban decarbonisation – the costs of transition, the benefits of energy efficiency, green jobs, health co-benefits and carbon market revenues – is therefore of critical policy relevance. In this article, we explore three complimentary ways in which low-carbon city development might bring economic benefits: (i) direct cost savings and employment benefits; (ii) carbon market and green finance methods; and (iii) comparative development trajectories between leading jurisdictions. Using data from the IEA, IRENA, OECD and the EU Emissions Trading System, and case studies from Copenhagen, China’s Low-Carbon City Pilot programme and the European Union, the paper makes the case that the economic case for low-carbon urbanism is solid and is getting stronger if policy frameworks can be crafted to align financial incentives with decarbonisation objectives. The report concludes with policy recommendations regarding the design of carbon pricing, the mobilisation of green funding and the management of an equitable transition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] W.D. Nordhaus: Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114 (2017) No. 7, p. 1518-1523.

[2] G. He, Y. Bai, F. Whittington & X. Liu: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: a multi-country meta-analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 11 (2024) No. 1, Article 276.

[3] United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, New York 2015). Resolution A/RES/70/1.

[4] OECD: Sustainable Bonds: Debt Financing for the Climate Transition (OECD Publishing, Paris 2025).

[5] International Energy Agency: CO2 Emissions in 2023 (IEA, Paris 2024).

[6] International Renewable Energy Agency & International Labour Organization: Renewable Energy and Jobs: Annual Review 2024 (IRENA, Abu Dhabi 2024).

[7] OECD: The Cost of Air Pollution: Health Impacts of Road Transport (OECD Publishing, Paris 2014).

[8] European Commission: EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): Fourth Trading Phase 2021-2030. Climate Action, European Commission, 2024. Information on: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/carbon-markets/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en

[9] Global Sustainable Investment Alliance: Global Sustainable Investment Review 2024 (GSIA, Washington D.C. 2025).

[10] City of Copenhagen: Copenhagen 2030 Climate Neutrality Action Plan (City of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2023).

[11] H. Wang, Q. Zhang & Y. Li: The impact of low-carbon pilot policy on carbon emissions: evidence from 212 Chinese cities. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 34 (2025) No. 1, p. 443-456.

[12] M.E. Porter & C. van der Linde: Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9 (1995) No. 4, p. 97-118.

[13] IEA: World Energy Outlook 2024 (IEA, Paris 2024).

[14] Climate Bonds Initiative: Sustainable Debt Market Summary H1 2024 (Climate Bonds Initiative, London 2024).

[15] N. Stern: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007).

Downloads

Published

25-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liao, H. (2026). Discussion on Economic Benefit Analysis and Sustainable Development Path in Low-Carbon City Development. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 6(5), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.54691/2m4qhe95