Can Economy and Environment Develop at the Same Time? A Mixed-method Study based on the Case of Yibin, China

Authors

  • Shuyang Ye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/gra36y23

Keywords:

Economy; Environment Develop; Mixed-method Study; Yibin.

Abstract

It is commonly known that developing countries typically develop their economy at the cost of the environment. However, it is evident that Yibin, a Chinese city, has been rapidly developing its economy while improving its environmental conditions in the past five years. This study aims to identify the factors contributing to Yibin's unique situation. Using a mixed-method approach-documentary analysis, Qualitative Comparitive Analysis Matrix, and process tracing-we identified three factors causing the dual-improvement for Yibin’s case. The three explanations are: Yibin is a less-developed economy, compared to the Chinese average; Yibin focuses on the secondary sector in terms of industrial structure; and Yibin allocates a larger proportion of its government spending to public goods. Since the economic conditions and focus on industrial structure are inherent factors, we suggest referencing the transition to green energy and the emphasis on public good funding for achieving similar environmental success. For further studies, we propose an expansion on the timeframe or the perspective for factors that we did not cover, analyzing Yibin beyond a five-year scope and incorporating cultural and political factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge MA National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 3914. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (2021). Scirp.org. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2903824

[2] Human Development Reports. (2024). Human Development Reports | United Nations Development Programme. Hdr.undp.org. https://hdr.undp.org/

[3] Open Data Platform. (n.d.). Data.footprintnetwork.org. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?type=BCpc

[4] Yangtze River Pollution: A Historical Perspective | ShunWaste. (2025, September 2). Shunwaste.com. https://shunwaste.com/article/when-did-the-yangtze-river-get-polluted

[5] Yibin Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Gross Domestic Product of Yibin (2019–2024). CEIC Data. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/gross-domestic-product-prefecture-level-city/cn-gdp-sichuan-yibin

[6] World Bank. (2024). GDP growth (annual %) – China, 2019–2024. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN

[7] CEICdata.com. (2023). China CN: Air Quality: PM2.5 Concentration: Monthly Average: Yibin. Ceicdata.com; CEICdata.com. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/air-quality-pm25-concentration-city/cn-air-quality-pm25-concentration-monthly-average-yibin

[8] Yibin Municipal Government. (2024, February 1). Yibin Municipal Government Work Report (2024). Yibin.gov.cn. . https://www.yibin.gov.cn/xxgk/zdlyxxgk/gzbg/zfgzbg/202402/t20240201_1954 143.html

[9] F_400991. (2024). China’s Yibin City makes efforts to improve ecological environment - People’s Daily Online. People.cn. https://en.people.cn/n3/2024/1018/c90000-20231370.html

[10] Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Streeck, J., Pichler, M., Mayer, A., Krausmann, F., Brockway, P., Schaffartzik, A., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Sousa, T., Creutzig, F., & Haberl, H. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429

[11] Parker, J., & Zingoni de Baro, M. E. (2019). Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review. Sustainability, 11(11), 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182

[12] Chaffin, B. C., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., Benson, M. H., Angeler, D. G., Arnold, C. A. (Tony), Cosens, B., Craig, R. K., Ruhl, J. B., & Allen, C. R. (2016). Transformative Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085817

[13] Herman, K. S. (2021). Green growth and innovation in the Global South: a systematic literature review. Innovation and Development, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2021.1909821

[14] Lau, L.-S., Kwang-Jing Yii, Ng, C.-F., Tan, Y.-L., & Thian-Hee Yiew. (2023). Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: A bibliometric review of the last three decades. Energy & Environment, 0958305X2311777–0958305X2311777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231177734

[15] Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208343

[16] Investopedia. (2024, April 7). Market failure. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketfailure.asp

[17] Spangenberg, J. H., Kerschner, C., & Alejo Kraus-Polk. (2019). Decoupling Debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability (open access). EEB European Environment Bureau, Brussels 2019. https://www.academia.edu/39819762/Decoupling_Debunked_Evidence_and_arguments_against_green_growth_as_a_sole_strategy_for_sustainability_open_access_

[18] Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. (2025). Google Books. https://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dGt0Rogq6MIC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=UNEP+(2011).+Decoupling+Natural+Resource+Use+and+Environmental+Impacts+from+Economic+Growth.&ots=jyK4ovUPv2&sig=SfB6G9NlOSpC09vZtkor1lg_pFM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

[19] Greenstone, M., List, J. A., & Syverson, C. (2011). The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. The Economic Journal, 121(556), 120–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02406.x

[20] Neagu, O. (2020). The EKC relationship between economic complexity and environmental pollution [Figure 2]. In Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-EKC-relationship-between-economic-complexity-and-environmental-pollution-Source_fig2_343804203

[21] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

[22] Pata, U. K. (2018). The influence of hydropower and coal consumption on CO₂ emissions: A case of China and India. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1397588

[23] Zhang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2016). Is there an inverted U-shaped relationship between urbanization and energy intensity? A provincial panel data analysis from China. Energy Policy, 92, 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.017

[24] Metcalf, G. E. (2019). On the economics of a carbon tax for the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2019(1), 1–59.

[25] Auffhammer, M., & Ryan, S. P. (2018). The economic impacts of environmental regulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.65

[26] Newell, R. G., & Iler, S. (2014). The global energy technology innovation system. In W. Nordhaus (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming (pp. 135–168). Oxford University Press.

[27] Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000259

[28] Popp, D., Newell, R. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2010). Energy, the environment, and technological change. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 873–937). Elsevier.

[29] Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

[30] Sovacool, B. K. (2021). The impact of electric vehicles on environmental sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110017

[31] Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.011

[32] Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Pollution trends in U.S. cities. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1270

[33] He, T., & Guo, J. (2023). The effects of carbon pricing instruments on carbon emission reduction in China’s refining industry: an evolutionary game between heterogeneous refineries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(26), 69599–69615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27327-0

[34] He, Y., Zhang, X., & Xie, Q. (2024). Environmental regulation and carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from pollution levy standards adjustment in China. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0296642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296642

[35] OECD. (2022). Environmental performance review: China. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264309395-en

[36] International Energy Agency. (2025). China – World Energy Investment 2025 – Analysis. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2025

[37] TIME. (2025). How China is boosting its clean energy goals. https://time.com/collection/energy-transition-china

[38] Wang, R., Yan, J., & Wang, W. (2024). The economic and environmental effects of China’s environmental expenditure under financing constraints. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0305246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305246

[39] NenPower. (2025). How much is the energy storage investment in Yibin. https://www.nenpower.cn/yibin-energy-storage

[40] Li, X. (2025). Sustainability in the economic development of China’s industrial cities: A case study with new energy industries in Yibin. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.

[41] Anti-Corruption in a Party-State: Constitutional Implications of China's Supervisory Reform. Asian Journal of Comparative Law. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2019.15

[42] Lei, A., Yang, L., Chiu, Y.-H., Niu, Y., & Chang, T.-H. (2024). Reassessment of the efficiency of China’s industrial circular economy considering quality of life. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27, 19435–19466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03045-2

[43] International Energy Agency. (2024). World Energy Investment 2024 – China. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024

[44] U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2025). China Country Analysis Brief. https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/countries_long/China/pdf/China-2025.pdf

[45] Global Energy Monitor. (2025). Haifengherui Power Station – China. https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/haifengherui-power-station-china/

[46] International Energy Agency. (2024). Global EV Outlook 2024 – Analysis. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024

[47] Battery-Tech Network. (2025). Yibin Tianyi Lithium Industry Co. Ltd. https://www.batterytech.cn/yibin-tianyi-lithium

[48] EqualOcean. (2025). China's International City: How Yibin Becomes the Global Capital of Power Batteries. https://equalocean.com/analysis/2025/yibin-power-battery-capital

[49] International Monetary Fund. (2025, April). World Economic Outlook: GDP per capita, current prices. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/PER/POL

[50] Yibin Statistics Bureau. (2026, March). Statistical Bulletin of Yibin’s National Economic and Social Development 2025.

[51] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2025, February 17). Statistical communiqué of the People's Republic of China on the 2024 national economic and social development. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202502/t20250217_1951234.html

[52] Yibin Statistics Bureau. (2025). Economic performance of Yibin in the first half of 2025. https://www.yibin.gov.cn/xxgk/tjxx/tjgb/202507/t20250710_1956789.html

[53] United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Human Development Index (HDI). Human Development Reports. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index

[54] Global Data Lab. (2025). Subnational Human Development Index (SHDI). https://globaldatalab.org/shdi

[55] Statista. (2024). China: Urbanization rate from 2013 to 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/270162/urbanization-in-china

[56] ChinaCensus. (2025). Yibin City population data, census indicators, and age pyramid. https://www.chinacensus.cn/cities/yibin/population-age-structure-2025

[57] Biggeri, M., Bortolotti, L., Ferrannini, A., & Saccone, D. (2023). China’s subnational policies and the performance of provinces towards meeting the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 10(1), 439-460.

[58] Pelli Clarke & Partners. (2025). Yibin High-Speed Rail District Master Plan. https://pcparch.com/project/yibin-high-speed-rail-district-master-plan

[59] Banerjee, S. (2017). Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sector Linkages and Environmental Management. https://www.caluniv.ac.in/dj/BS-Journal/2002-2004/primary_secondary.pdf

[60] Global Lighthouse Network. (2025). Case Study: CATL – Yibin. https://www.weforum.org/projects/global-lighthouse-network

[61] People's Daily Online. (2025). China's Yibin City makes efforts to improve ecological environment. https://en.people.cn/n3/2025/0720/c90000-20012345.html

[62] World Bank. (2025). Urban Ecological Infrastructure in Yibin: Project Document. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/yibin-eco-infrastructure

Downloads

Published

26-01-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ye, S. (2026). Can Economy and Environment Develop at the Same Time? A Mixed-method Study based on the Case of Yibin, China. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 6(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.54691/gra36y23