On the Measurement and Improvement Strategies of New Quality Productivity in Chinese Rural Areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/85fptd05Keywords:
New Quality Productive Forces; Marxist Political Economy; Rural Governance; Rural Culture; Entropy Weight Method.Abstract
Based on the dialectical relationship between productive forces and production relations, economic base and superstructure in Marxist political economy, this article constructs an indicator system that includes five dimensions: rural new quality workers, labor materials, labor objects, rural governance, and rural culture. Using entropy weight method, Dagum Gini coefficient, and obstacle degree model, the development level of rural new quality productive forces at the provincial level in China from 2012 to 2022 is measured and analyzed. Research shows that the overall productivity of rural areas in China is on the rise, with an average annual growth rate of about 20%. However, the overall level is still relatively low, and there is a non-equilibrium pattern of "eastern>central ≈ western>northeast" among regions; The obstacle level of rural governance is the highest (0.3856), becoming the core constraint factor, followed by insufficient quality of workers and low level of digitalization of labor materials. Differential decomposition indicates that regional differences are the main source of overall differences, and structural barriers are mainly reflected in weak rural e-commerce ecosystems, low agricultural production efficiency, and insufficient cultural resource transformation. Based on this, it is proposed to systematically promote the cultivation of new quality workers, the digital upgrading of labor materials, the diversified expansion of labor objects, the innovation of rural governance mechanisms, and the construction of rural cultural ecology. Differentiated regional strategies should be implemented to promote the comprehensive improvement of new quality productive forces, help rural revitalization and common prosperity.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang Peng, Ji Huimin. Research on the Scientific Connotation and Practical Path of New Quality Productivity: Analysis from the Perspective of Production Factors. Journal of Changchun University, 2024,34(05):43-48.
[2] Li Dongmin, Guo Wen. The Rich Connotation, Generating Logic, and Contemporary Implications of New Quality Productivity [J]. Research on Technology, Economics, and Management, 2024,(04):8-13.
[3] You Liang, Tian Xiangyu. Agricultural New Quality Productivity: Realistic Logic, Connotation Analysis, and Generation Mechanism [J]. Economic Issues, 2024,(06):27-35.
[4] Yuan Gao, Ma Jiujie. Agricultural New Quality Productivity: A Political Economy Perspective [J]. Agricultural Economic Issues, 2024,(04):81-94.
[5] Lei Xue. Measurement of China's new quality productivity level, decomposition of regional differences, and dynamic evolution [J]. Industrial Technology and Economics, 2024,43(06):30-39.
[6] Shi Xiongtian, Yu Zhengyong. Measurement, Structural Decomposition, and Spatial Convergence Analysis of Regional New Quality Productivity in China [J]. Industrial Technology and Economics, 2024,43(05):90-99.
[7] Wang Yahong, Wei Yueli. The Impact of Agricultural New Quality Productivity on Farmers' Income Increase [J]. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Economic Management, 2024,23(04):446-455.
[8] Judy, Ye Linxiang. Green Resilience of Chinese Agriculture: Horizontal Measurement and Spatiotemporal Evolution [J]. Statistics and Decision making, 2024,40(13):118-123.
[9] Liu Yanfeng. Empowering the Construction of Rural Digital Libraries with New Quality Productivity: Mechanisms of Action, Practical Obstacles, and Practical Paths [J]. Library Theory and Practice, 2024,(06):43-49.
[10] Zhu Jinzhe, Zhou Dan. The Significance, Constraints, and Optimization Path of Empowering Agricultural Economy with New Quality Productivity for High Quality Development [J]. Contemporary Rural Finance and Economics, 2024,(05):40-44.
[11] Mikaning, Li Dayu, Dong Changqi. New quality productivity driven by computing power: essential characteristics, basic logic, and modernization of national governance [J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2024,21(02):1-14+170.
[12] Zhao Guangyuan. Zhao Guangyuan: New Quality Productivity and New Governance of Rural Society [J]. China Rural Discovery, 2024,(04).
[13] Liu Huajun, Zhao Hao, Yang Qian. Regional disparities and influencing factors in the development of China's brand economy: an empirical study based on Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method and data from China's top 500 brands [J]. Economic Review, 2012,(03):57-65.
[14] Yang Mingyan, Pu Zhengning. Measurement of inter provincial digital technology innovation level and regional differences in China [J]. Statistical Research, 2024,41(02):15-28.
[15] Ning Jiankang, Wang Guirong, Meng Xiaoxian, etc. China's Agricultural New Quality Productivity: Statistical Measurement and Spatiotemporal Evolution [J/OL]. Research World, 1-15 [2020-09-19].
[16] Jia Jin, Lu Jinpeng. The logical implications, practical challenges, and development directions of promoting modernization of rural governance through new agricultural quality productivity [J]. 2025,24(2):26-34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Sustainable Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.