Human-Environment Relationship Research from a Multidisciplinary Integration Perspective in Geography

Haishan Zuo

doi:10.54691/64t83m16

Authors

Haishan Zuo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/64t83m16

Keywords:

Human-environment Relationship; Geography; Multidisciplinary Integration; Sustainable Development; Challenges and Prospects.

Abstract

The human-environment relationship, as a core research area in geography, profoundly reflects the complex interactions and dynamic evolution between human society and the natural environment. Based on a literature review methodology, this paper systematically traces the theoretical evolution of human-environment relationships from environmental determinism and possibilism to sustainable development theory, with a focus on examining the pivotal role of multidisciplinary integration in geographical research. The findings reveal that this integration manifests in several key aspects: Firstly, the convergence between geography and "closely related" disciplines (e.g., ecology, economics, sociology) or "distantly related" fields is deepening, introducing novel concepts (e.g., resilience) and technical approaches (e.g., GIS, RS) that provide multidimensional analytical perspectives. Secondly, the internal sub-disciplines of geography-including human geography, physical geography, economic geography, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-are increasingly converging to form more comprehensive research frameworks. Concurrently, application domains continue to expand, covering critical areas such as resource management, urban-rural planning, environmental protection, and disaster prevention. Furthermore, research methodologies and technologies are continuously advancing, evidenced by the application of spatial statistics, complex system modeling, big data, and artificial intelligence (AI). The study also identifies significant challenges in multidisciplinary integration, including theoretical and methodological disparities between disciplines, barriers to resource consolidation, and practical difficulties in achieving sustainable development goals. Looking ahead, deeper integration can be realized through technology-driven innovation, the construction of cross-disciplinary research platforms, theoretical and methodological innovations in interdisciplinary studies, and problem-oriented research addressing global issues like climate change. These efforts will facilitate a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the complexities within human-environment systems, providing robust scientific support for addressing global environmental challenges and advancing regional sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fu Bojie. Geography: From knowledge, science to decision-making [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 1923–1932.

[2] Wu Chuanjun. On the core of geographical research: Human–land territorial system [J]. Economic Geography, 1991, 11(3): 1–6.

[3] Wu Chuanjun. Human–Land Relationship and Economic Layout [M]. Beijing: Xueyuan Press, 1998: 28–33.

[4] Cai Yunlong. The evolution of human–land relationship thought [J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 1989(01): 1–3.

[5] Sun Gennian. Temporal and spatial evolution and correspondence analysis of human–land relationships [J]. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography, 1998: 1–2.

[6] Miao Leilei, Wang Aimin. Research on the development of human–land relationship thought [J]. Science·Economy·Society, 2001, 19(02): 2–4.

[7] Yang Qingshan, Han Jie, Ding Sibao. World Geography [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004: 91–99.

[8] Han Yong, Yu Bin, Lu Yan, et al. Progress in foreign human–land relationship research [J]. World Regional Studies, 2015, 24(04): 122–130.

[9] Bennett D, McGinnis D. Coupled and complex: human–environment interaction in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA [J]. Geoforum, 2008, 39(2): 833–845.

[10] Ahlqvist O, Loffing T, et al. Geospatial human-environment simulation through integration of massive multiplayer online games and geographic information systems [J]. Transactions in GIS, 2012, 16(3): 331–350.

[11] Dearing J A, Battarbee R W, et al. Human–environment interactions: learning from the past [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2006, 6(1–2): 1–16.

[12] Giannecchini M, Twine W, Vogel C. Land-cover change and human–environment interactions in a rural cultural landscape in South Africa [J]. The Geographical Journal, 2007, 173(1): 26–42.

[13] Buser M. The production of space in metropolitan regions: a Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change [J]. Planning Theory, 2012, 11(3): 279–298.

[14] Carp J. “Ground-truthing” representations of social space using Lefebvre's conceptual triad [J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2008, 28(2): 129–142.

[15] Van Den Berg M. Femininity as a city marketing strategy: gender bending Rotterdam [J]. Urban Studies, 2012, 49(1): 153–168.

[16] Liu Yansui. Modern human–land relationship and human–land system science [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(08): 1221–1234.

[17] Fang Chuanglin. Reflections on the future direction of human geography research in China [J]. Human Geography, 2011, 26(04): 1–6.

[18] Zhou Xinyu, Chen Qin. A review of disciplinary integration and interdisciplinary research in geography [J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 32(04): 136–145.

[19] Bao Jigang, Weng Shixiu. On the integration of physical and human geography [J]. Tropical Geography, 2024, 44(01): 24–27.

[20] Wang Jian, Zhang Guoyou. The future of geography: prospects for geographical development [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2024, 44(01): 1–8.

[21] Li Chaoqun. Research on the development trends of human–land relationships [J]. Yinshan Academic Journal (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 30(03): 87–90.