Study of Supplier-led Supply Chain Decision-Making Considered Fairness Concern

Authors

  • Yonglong Wang
  • Xuemei Yin
  • Meili Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/rxj8vn39

Keywords:

Equity Concerns; Supply Chain Decision-Making; Stackelberg Game; Supplier Dominance.

Abstract

In order to study the supply chain decision-making problem considering supplier dominance under the perspective of fairness concern. This paper constructs a supplier-led Stackelberg game model for three scenarios: suppliers with fairness concern preferences, retailers with fairness concern preferences, and risk-neutrality, and solves it by using backward induction, analysing the impact of fairness concerns on the decision-making behaviours and profits of chain members. The results show that the wholesale price is largest when the supplier has a fair concern preference, followed by the risk-neutral, retailer has a fair concern preference scenario; the relationship between the size of the supplier's production effort, the retailer's retail price, and the supplier's expected profit in the three scenarios is more complex and depends on the size of the stochastic output factor and the level of fair concern; furthermore, the retailer's expected profit is smallest when the retailer has a fair concern preference, followed by the risk-neutral, retailer has a fair concern preference scenario. In addition, the retailer's expected profit is smallest when the retailer has a fairness preference, followed by the risk-neutral, supplier-fairness concern scenario.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] L. Yang, X. C. Xiao, Z. Y. Zhang: Optimal pricing strategies for fresh produce supply chains with demand-dependent effort levels. Journal of Systems & Management, Vol. 26(2017) No.1, p. 142-153.

[2] Y. Feng, Y. Z. Zhang: Supply chain decision-making and efficiency evaluation with TPL service value-added under different power structures. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 26(2018) No.10, p. 164-175.

[3] M. J. Jiang, D. Y. Chen: Revenue sharing and green innovation investment of green supply chain under fairness preference. Control and Decision, Vol. 35(2020) No. 6, p. 1463-1468.

[4] K. Cao, Y. Mei: Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion. Sustainability, Vol. 14(2022) No. 23, p. 16006.

[5] T. Nie, S. Du: Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 258(2017) No. 2, p. 491-500.

[6] Y. D. Li, C. L. Xian, Z. Z. Guan: Research on decision-making and coordination of supplier-dominated supply chain under dual behavioral preferences. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Vol. 35(2021) No. 3, p. 181-194.

[7] J. Jian, B. Li, N. Zhang, et al.: Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 298(2021), p. 126779.

[8] C. Y. Shang, Z. M. Guan, L. Y. Mi: Research on Decision of Closed- Loop Supply Chain with Different Power Structures under Risk Aversion. Computer Engineering and Applications, Vol. 58(2022) No. 19, p. 309-317.

[9] Z. L. Sun, X. P. Wang, J. H. Ruan, et al.: Impact of Different Game Power Structures on the Manufacturer Dual-channel Supply Chain. Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 29(2020) No. 9, p. 106-114.

[10] C. B. Chen, Z. Yang: Review of supply chain coordination mechanism theory. Productivity Research, Vol. 2009 No. 4, p. 173-176.

[11] H. Wen, B. R. Zheng, X. G. Cao, et al.: Pricing and Coordination of Dual Channel Closed — loop Supply Chain with Different Channel Power Structure. Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 29(2020) No. 6, p. 65-74.

[12] D. Huang, J. L. Zhang: The impact of carbon tax on supply chain emissions abatement level in a supply Chain under different power structures. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 29(2021) No. 7, p. 57-70.

[13] L. Jin, M. Guo: Impact of brand-differentiated manufacturer's market invasion under different power structures. Chinese Journal of Management, Vol. 15(2018) No. 1, p. 135-143.

[14] Z. Huang: Stochastic differential game in the closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern retailer. Sustainability, Vol. 12(2020) No. 8, p. 3289.

[15] C. Mondal, B. C. Giri: Investigating a green supply chain with product recycling under retailer's fairness behavior. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, Vol. 18(2022) No. 5, p. 3641-3677.

[16] X. R. Li, Q. Wang: Research on decision-making of closed-loop supply chain considering retailer's service level and fairness concern. Management Review, Vol. 31(2019) No. 4, p. 228-239.

[17] Y. B. Wang, D. Gao, B. Y. Yuan: Vertical Cooperative Advertising Models for Dua-l Channel Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern. Journal of Systems & Management, Vol. 29(2020) No. 6, p. 1205-1214.

[18] Y. Wang, Z. Yu, L. Shen: Study on the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain with manufacturer fairness concerns. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57(2019) No. 9, p. 2788-2808.

[19] T. Y. Han, L. Liu, H. Jin: Reserch on dual-channel green supply chain decision making considering the government subsidy and fairness concerns. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 30(2022) No. 4, p. 194-204.

[20] Q. M. Zou, L. Q. Hu, T. J. Zou: Pricing and coordination of a supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon cap- and- trade mechanism. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 30(2022) No. 10, p. 142-154.

[21] G. P. Cachon, M. A. Lariviere: Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Science, Vol. 51(2005) No. 1, p. 30-44.

[22] S. F. Du, C. Du, L. Liang, et al.: Supply chain coordination considering fairness concerns. Journal of Management Sciences in China, Vol. 13(2010) No. 11, p. 41-48.

[23] Y. G. Zhong, G. M. Xing, B. Cao, et al.: The Impacts of Fairness Concern Behaviors of Competing Retailers on the Performance of a Supply Chain. Nankai Business Review, Vol. 25(2022) No. 2, p. 24-35.

[24] L. Yang, X. C. Xiao, Z. Y. Zhang: Optimal pricing strategy for fresh agricultural product supply chain with effort-level dependent demand. Journal of Systems & Management, Vol. 26(2017) No. 1, p. 142-153.

[25] F. Qin, F. Mai, M. J. Fry, et al.: Supply-chain performance anomalies: Fairness concerns under private cost information. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 252(2016) No. 1, p. 170-182.

[26] Y. L. Wang, X. M. Yin, X. Y. Zheng, et al.: Supply chain decision-making considering green technology effort: Effect on random output and retail price with fairness concerns. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, Vol. 57(2023) No. 1, p. 103-120.

[27] Y. L. Wang, H. Fu, X. Fang, et al.: Supply chain coordination strategy following output disruption. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 27(2019) No. 7, p. 137-146.

Downloads

Published

23-06-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Yin, X., & Song, M. (2025). Study of Supplier-led Supply Chain Decision-Making Considered Fairness Concern. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 5(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.54691/rxj8vn39